The problem of the blog, the recorded interviews, monologues, does not stray very far from the more traditional media. In fact, the information in the Web 2.0 is "free" and fragmented (aspect often counterproductive), but now as then, once a phenomenon built its power is undeniable. Who can respond to the opinions of a blogger, for example? A commentary would end in the ocean of rows in the bottom of the post that nobody is looking ... This does not question the good faith of the authors, but if tomorrow the blog owner N. 7 in the world to write that the sky is green? How many people managed to convince? How many got to get away from that thinking that this is no longer independent? Marrying 100% views, opinions, values \u200b\u200bof others is perhaps symptomatic of a lack of elaboration, dell'atrofizzazione an individual thought. In some groups are self thoughts autoelezione to "best." Typically those who think like you is an ignorant, misinformed, a person. Phenomena are the catalyst to draw more satisfaction and pleasure dall'aderire everything that is established by reference. Feel part of the group, get a shield with each other puts us in an iron cage. Your opinion is supported by the strength of a community (which starts to become a lobby), who starts against you automatically contrasts thousands of people. On the other hand I wonder why nobody wants to deal with these people, these bloggers. The escape of a face to face does nothing but feed the doubt. The question that may not be all bull.
(C)
0 comments:
Post a Comment